<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splintering Conversations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/</link>
	<description>Designing businesses, taking pictures, in New Orleans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:12:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=322#comment-707</guid>
		<description>True...  while the intent for many social networking sites may be about entertainment, users use them to communicate with people, and many sites are adding features to make it about communication.  Facebook&#039;s launch of IM within the site is a perfect example.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point: &quot;entertainment&quot; isn&#039;t really a two-sided conversation, but meant to be a one-way publishing of thoughts, ideas, content.  Even so, entertainment often sparks more thoughts and a conversation about its meaning, so it&#039;s important for us to learn how to efficiently share our ideas around what we create.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True&#8230;  while the intent for many social networking sites may be about entertainment, users use them to communicate with people, and many sites are adding features to make it about communication.  Facebook&#39;s launch of IM within the site is a perfect example.</p>
<p>Good point: &#8220;entertainment&#8221; isn&#39;t really a two-sided conversation, but meant to be a one-way publishing of thoughts, ideas, content.  Even so, entertainment often sparks more thoughts and a conversation about its meaning, so it&#39;s important for us to learn how to efficiently share our ideas around what we create.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/05/08/splintering-conversations/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=322#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Some interesting points.  But I think the intent behind social networking sites, many forums, and many blogs is entertainment and not conversation.  And often when conversation is the intent, it should be regarded as entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting points.  But I think the intent behind social networking sites, many forums, and many blogs is entertainment and not conversation.  And often when conversation is the intent, it should be regarded as entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
