<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we losing our focus?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/</link>
	<description>Designing Businesses, taking pictures, in New Orleans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:05:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Start Here: Photography Business Models &#124; Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Start Here: Photography Business Models &#124; Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>[...] Are we losing our focus? (on the Canon 5D II) “The medium is the message”; multimedia and video communicate differently than static images simply because of the medium used. Not all stories can be told the same way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Are we losing our focus? (on the Canon 5D II) “The medium is the message”; multimedia and video communicate differently than static images simply because of the medium used. Not all stories can be told the same way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisha D Herron</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisha D Herron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>nice article! nice site. you&#039;re in my rss feed now ;-)&lt;br&gt;keep it up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article! nice site. you&#39;re in my rss feed now ;-)<br />keep it up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-929</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re lazy?  Not a chance...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible for an artist to look at their work without attachment?  is it possible to create something without attaching yourself to it?  I don&#039;t equate attachment with caring, or equate &quot;looking without attachment&quot; with &quot;feeling, caring or believing in one&#039;s work&quot;... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agreed: evolving one&#039;s artistic vision comes through experiencing life, not experiencing art.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a problem for any creative soul in any medium (marketing included).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, a camera doesn&#039;t change that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s important to have the right tools to create what you create, but improving the tool does not necessarily equate with improving the results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Selecting a still from a stream of images is interesting: it seems more similar to how our minds interpret experiences.  But the processes for the artist is so different, simply because of when you&#039;re selecting the right still to preserve.  Do you throw away the rest of the stream?  Is your judgment drastically different because you&#039;re existing in a different moment? (taking a picture in the moment v. reviewing the stream in a different moment)  I don&#039;t know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re lazy?  Not a chance&#8230;</p>
<p>Is it possible for an artist to look at their work without attachment?  is it possible to create something without attaching yourself to it?  I don&#39;t equate attachment with caring, or equate &#8220;looking without attachment&#8221; with &#8220;feeling, caring or believing in one&#39;s work&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>Agreed: evolving one&#39;s artistic vision comes through experiencing life, not experiencing art.</p>
<p>It&#39;s a problem for any creative soul in any medium (marketing included).</p>
<p>And no, a camera doesn&#39;t change that.</p>
<p>It&#39;s important to have the right tools to create what you create, but improving the tool does not necessarily equate with improving the results.</p>
<p>Selecting a still from a stream of images is interesting: it seems more similar to how our minds interpret experiences.  But the processes for the artist is so different, simply because of when you&#39;re selecting the right still to preserve.  Do you throw away the rest of the stream?  Is your judgment drastically different because you&#39;re existing in a different moment? (taking a picture in the moment v. reviewing the stream in a different moment)  I don&#39;t know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re lazy?  Not a chance...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is it possible for an artist to look at their work without attachment?  is it possible to create something without attaching yourself to it?  I don&#039;t equate attachment with caring, or equate &quot;looking without attachment&quot; with &quot;feeling, caring or believing in one&#039;s work&quot;... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Agreed: evolving one&#039;s artistic vision comes through experiencing life, not experiencing art.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s a problem for any creative soul in any medium (marketing included).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And no, a camera doesn&#039;t change that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s important to have the right tools to create what you create, but improving the tool does not necessarily equate with improving the results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Selecting a still from a stream of images is interesting: it seems more similar to how our minds interpret experiences.  But the processes for the artist is so different, simply because of when you&#039;re selecting the right still to preserve.  Do you throw away the rest of the stream?  Is your judgment drastically different because you&#039;re existing in a different moment? (taking a picture in the moment v. reviewing the stream in a different moment)  I don&#039;t know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#39;re lazy?  Not a chance&#8230;</p>
<p>Is it possible for an artist to look at their work without attachment?  is it possible to create something without attaching yourself to it?  I don&#39;t equate attachment with caring, or equate &#8220;looking without attachment&#8221; with &#8220;feeling, caring or believing in one&#39;s work&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>Agreed: evolving one&#39;s artistic vision comes through experiencing life, not experiencing art.</p>
<p>It&#39;s a problem for any creative soul in any medium (marketing included).</p>
<p>And no, a camera doesn&#39;t change that.</p>
<p>It&#39;s important to have the right tools to create what you create, but improving the tool does not necessarily equate with improving the results.</p>
<p>Selecting a still from a stream of images is interesting: it seems more similar to how our minds interpret experiences.  But the processes for the artist is so different, simply because of when you&#39;re selecting the right still to preserve.  Do you throw away the rest of the stream?  Is your judgment drastically different because you&#39;re existing in a different moment? (taking a picture in the moment v. reviewing the stream in a different moment)  I don&#39;t know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregorylent</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>gregorylent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-922</guid>
		<description>i have another series for you, a review of good blog themes for photogs and artists .. yeah, i am lazy, you do it for me please ...  my old and crappy art site is here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gregorylent.com&quot;&gt;http://www.gregorylent.com&lt;/a&gt;   and i really need to update and upgrade it ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;back to your post ... how do memories form in our mind?  we don&#039;t know, but out of the entire stream of experience some one thing goes boink and clicks ... a still photo extracted from a stream of video seems similar, and given how cool serendipity can be, will result in some spectacular photos ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;avoiding marketing messages is as true in photography as in any other walk of life, (sorry all you marketing guys, i only hate your profession, not you) but what really contributes to evolving one&#039;s artistic vision?  suffering.  loss.  frustration.  failure.  and the gift of deeper perception that can result if one is lucky.  and a whole lot of practice and the ability to not take your own work personally, just look at it without attachment ... and feeling how it feels to you.  and then do more ..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dang, what were we talking about again?  anyway, nice post.  do i want a canon super mark 5?  not really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;enjoy, gregory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have another series for you, a review of good blog themes for photogs and artists .. yeah, i am lazy, you do it for me please &#8230;  my old and crappy art site is here <a href="http://www.gregorylent.com">http://www.gregorylent.com</a>   and i really need to update and upgrade it &#8230;</p>
<p>back to your post &#8230; how do memories form in our mind?  we don&#39;t know, but out of the entire stream of experience some one thing goes boink and clicks &#8230; a still photo extracted from a stream of video seems similar, and given how cool serendipity can be, will result in some spectacular photos &#8230;</p>
<p>avoiding marketing messages is as true in photography as in any other walk of life, (sorry all you marketing guys, i only hate your profession, not you) but what really contributes to evolving one&#39;s artistic vision?  suffering.  loss.  frustration.  failure.  and the gift of deeper perception that can result if one is lucky.  and a whole lot of practice and the ability to not take your own work personally, just look at it without attachment &#8230; and feeling how it feels to you.  and then do more ..</p>
<p>dang, what were we talking about again?  anyway, nice post.  do i want a canon super mark 5?  not really.</p>
<p>enjoy, gregory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregorylent</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2008/09/29/are-we-losing-our-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>gregorylent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=786#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>i have another series for you, a review of good blog themes for photogs and artists .. yeah, i am lazy, you do it for me please ...  my old and crappy art site is here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gregorylent.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.gregorylent.com&lt;/a&gt;   and i really need to update and upgrade it ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;back to your post ... how do memories form in our mind?  we don&#039;t know, but out of the entire stream of experience some one thing goes boink and clicks ... a still photo extracted from a stream of video seems similar, and given how cool serendipity can be, will result in some spectacular photos ...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;avoiding marketing messages is as true in photography as in any other walk of life, (sorry all you marketing guys, i only hate your profession, not you) but what really contributes to evolving one&#039;s artistic vision?  suffering.  loss.  frustration.  failure.  and the gift of deeper perception that can result if one is lucky.  and a whole lot of practice and the ability to not take your own work personally, just look at it without attachment ... and feeling how it feels to you.  and then do more ..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;dang, what were we talking about again?  anyway, nice post.  do i want a canon super mark 5?  not really.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;enjoy, gregory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have another series for you, a review of good blog themes for photogs and artists .. yeah, i am lazy, you do it for me please &#8230;  my old and crappy art site is here <a href="http://www.gregorylent.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gregorylent.com</a>   and i really need to update and upgrade it &#8230;</p>
<p>back to your post &#8230; how do memories form in our mind?  we don&#39;t know, but out of the entire stream of experience some one thing goes boink and clicks &#8230; a still photo extracted from a stream of video seems similar, and given how cool serendipity can be, will result in some spectacular photos &#8230;</p>
<p>avoiding marketing messages is as true in photography as in any other walk of life, (sorry all you marketing guys, i only hate your profession, not you) but what really contributes to evolving one&#39;s artistic vision?  suffering.  loss.  frustration.  failure.  and the gift of deeper perception that can result if one is lucky.  and a whole lot of practice and the ability to not take your own work personally, just look at it without attachment &#8230; and feeling how it feels to you.  and then do more ..</p>
<p>dang, what were we talking about again?  anyway, nice post.  do i want a canon super mark 5?  not really.</p>
<p>enjoy, gregory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
