<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many photographers are &#8220;professionals&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/</link>
	<description>Designing businesses, taking pictures, in New Orleans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:12:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Start Here: Photography Business Models &#124; Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-2035</link>
		<dc:creator>Start Here: Photography Business Models &#124; Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-2035</guid>
		<description>[...]  How many photographers are “professionals”? Getty and Flickr took the easy operational route; selecting images instead of photographers would have broadened the base of photographers and forced Getty and Flickr to educate many photographers about stock pricing, royalty-free and rights-managed licensing schemes, model and property releases and many other nuances involved in stock imagery. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  How many photographers are “professionals”? Getty and Flickr took the easy operational route; selecting images instead of photographers would have broadened the base of photographers and forced Getty and Flickr to educate many photographers about stock pricing, royalty-free and rights-managed licensing schemes, model and property releases and many other nuances involved in stock imagery. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting (and accurate) way to reword the &quot;professional&quot; and &quot;amateur&quot; distinction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to know the full details behind the Getty - Flickr - Yahoo negotiations and understand the full trade-offs involved...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s an interesting (and accurate) way to reword the &#8220;professional&#8221; and &#8220;amateur&#8221; distinction.</p>
<p>I would love to know the full details behind the Getty &#8211; Flickr &#8211; Yahoo negotiations and understand the full trade-offs involved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Torrens</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Torrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>iStock actually refer to their contributors as either &#039;professionals&#039; or &#039;hobbyists&#039;, saying that &#039;amateur&#039; implies they&#039;re not being paid. I think that&#039;s a clear and clever way to define the two groups. Particularly given the quality of some of the hobbyists is equal to, or above, that of many professionals (in rare cases).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tend to agree with your thoughts on FlickrStock being more in line with the Flickr ethos. I&#039;m very curious about how the Getty deal was more appealing to Flickr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iStock actually refer to their contributors as either &#39;professionals&#39; or &#39;hobbyists&#39;, saying that &#39;amateur&#39; implies they&#39;re not being paid. I think that&#39;s a clear and clever way to define the two groups. Particularly given the quality of some of the hobbyists is equal to, or above, that of many professionals (in rare cases).  </p>
<p>I tend to agree with your thoughts on FlickrStock being more in line with the Flickr ethos. I&#39;m very curious about how the Getty deal was more appealing to Flickr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getty closes down Scoopt: Surprised? &#124; Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Getty closes down Scoopt: Surprised? &#124; Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] if(!(x=d[n])&amp;&amp;d.all) x=d.all[n]; for (i=0;!x&amp;&amp;i  PHOTOGRAPHY, TRAVEL &amp; CULTURE      &#171; How many photographers are &#8220;professionals&#8221;? How to Live a Nomadic Lifestyle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if(!(x=d[n])&#38;&#38;d.all) x=d.all[n]; for (i=0;!x&#38;&#38;i  PHOTOGRAPHY, TRAVEL &#38; CULTURE      &laquo; How many photographers are &#8220;professionals&#8221;? How to Live a Nomadic Lifestyle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;m familiar with ClusterShot and a fan of the functionality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve mentioned ClusterShot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/01/26/flickr-a-wasted-opportunity-for-innovation-in-stock-photography/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on this site before&lt;/a&gt;, and as you probably know I recently started testing ClusterShot myself: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.clustershot.com/taylordavidson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.clustershot.com/taylordavidson&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#39;m familiar with ClusterShot and a fan of the functionality.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve mentioned ClusterShot <a href="http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/01/26/flickr-a-wasted-opportunity-for-innovation-in-stock-photography/" rel="nofollow">on this site before</a>, and as you probably know I recently started testing ClusterShot myself: <a href="https://www.clustershot.com/taylordavidson" rel="nofollow">https://www.clustershot.com/taylordavidson</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/2009/02/03/how-many-photographers-are-professionals/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylordavidson.com/writing/?p=1747#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m by no means a professional, but through the power of Google, more and more buyers are contacting me and my co-workers for images found in our regular galleries. In an effort to build a simple checkout tool to help with the transaction, we ended up creating &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clustershot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.clustershot.com&lt;/a&gt;. The ability for anyone with a gallery to allow their photos to be purchased is kind of related to your post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;a bit more about it: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2008/november/clustershot&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2008/nove...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m by no means a professional, but through the power of Google, more and more buyers are contacting me and my co-workers for images found in our regular galleries. In an effort to build a simple checkout tool to help with the transaction, we ended up creating <a href="http://www.clustershot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.clustershot.com</a>. The ability for anyone with a gallery to allow their photos to be purchased is kind of related to your post.</p>
<p>a bit more about it: <a href="http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2008/november/clustershot" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2008/nove.." rel="nofollow">http://www.actsofvolition.com/archive/2008/nove..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
